Official “Overstated” Evidence of Iranian Weapons in Iraq
QuestionGirl February 22nd, 2007 - 8:04 pmthe limits of U.S. intelligence in deciphering Iranian government actions
Gee, what did Valerie Plame do? Oh, that’s right….. she was a covert CIA agent investigating WMD’s. Where, you ask? Oh…..Iran!!! And where were the others fronted by Brewster Jennings working? Ohhhhh…….Iran. Gee, wonder if this has anything to do with our lack of intelligence in Iran. Ya think????
Feb. 21, 2007 - An anonymous U.S. official, assigned to provide a recent “background” briefing to the news media in Baghdad, strayed from his script and overstated evidence linking Iranian leaders to weapons found in Iraq, according to four U.S. intelligence officials familiar with the matter.
The White House is still trying to recover from the stumble, which happened during a much- anticipated Feb. 11 briefing. U.S. officials had hoped to use the event to ratchet up pressure on the Tehran regime. But instead of focusing public and congressional attention on the role of Iranian government agents in stoking violence in Iraq, the briefing wound up raising new questions about whether the Bush administration is hyping intelligence about Iran in much the same way it did about Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq four years ago.
The briefing has also inadvertently called attention to what may be an even more serious problem: the limits of U.S. intelligence in deciphering Iranian government actions. Unable to recruit enough reliable spies or collect sufficient hard technical intelligence about the country’s military and nuclear programs, U.S. intelligence agencies are being forced once again to fall back on “deductions” and “inferences.” In many ways, this is the same “guesswork” process that a White House review panel later concluded was governed by “groupthink” conclusions-which ultimately led to wrong calls about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
Read more at Newsweek
