A True Daily Double
Buck April 1st, 2007 - 9:02 amThe pattern from Bush’s second term suggests that the dismissals were half of a two-pronged approach: While getting rid of prosecutors who did not adhere closely to administration priorities, such as rigorous pursuit of immigration violations and GOP allegations of voter fraud, White House and Justice officials have seeded federal prosecutors’ offices with people on whom they can depend to carry out the administration’s agenda.
Sounds kinda illegal. Maybe it’s because it is. Just more of the same, thanks to GOP mastermind, Karl Rove. Which leads me to ask a question. If Rove has so much power, control and say over the president and government, why aren’t such men placed under the same amount of scrutiny during the election process as the president himself?
Prosecutor posts often go to Bush insiders
Less deference shown for locals, senators’ choices than in past
About one-third of the nearly four dozen U.S. attorney’s jobs that have changed hands since President Bush began his second term have been filled by the White House and the Justice Department with trusted administration insiders.
The people chosen as chief federal prosecutors on a temporary or permanent basis since early 2005 include 10 senior aides to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, according to an analysis of government records. Several came from the White House or other government agencies. Some lacked experience as prosecutors or had no connection to the districts in which they were sent to work, the records and biographical information show.
The new U.S. attorneys filled vacancies created through natural turnover in addition to the firings of eight prosecutors last year that have prompted a political uproar and congressional investigations.
No other administration in contemporary times has had such a clear pattern of filling chief prosecutors’ jobs with its own staff members, said experts on U.S. attorney’s offices. Those experts said the emphasis in appointments traditionally has been on local roots and deference to home’state senators, whose support has been crucial to win confirmation of the nominees.
