Followed a link I saw in the MediaMatters box over in the sidebar to this:

MediaMatters:

Limbaugh said Virginia Tech shooter “had to be a liberal“

On the April 19 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, host Rush Limbaugh declared that the perpetrator of the April 16 Virginia Tech shootings “had to be a liberal,” adding: “You start railing against the rich, and all this other — this guy’s a liberal. He was turned into a liberal somewhere along the line. So it’s a liberal that committed this act.” Limbaugh then complained, in a possible reference to Media Matters for America, that “Now the drive-bys will read on a website that I’m attacking liberalism by comparing this guy to them. That’s exactly what they do every day, ladies and gentlemen. I’m just pointing out a fact. I am making no extrapolation.” Limbaugh regularly describes mainstream media sources as “the drive-by media.”

Anything to score points with your boob audience, right, Rush? Well, I think you are wrong. I think Cho was a Limbaugh-wanna-be. And I think I have the proof to back it up:

Office of National Drug Control Policy:

Past year illicit drug users were also about 16 times more likely than nonusers to report being arrested and booked for larceny or theft; more than 14 times more likely to be arrested and booked for such offenses as driving under the influence, drunkenness, or liquor law violations; and more than 9 times more likely to be arrested and booked on an assault charge.

You see folks, Rush Limbaugh is a known drug addict. Being as such, he is 10 more times likely to fire a weapon into a crowd of college students…. and 50-times more likely to be an obnoxious f_ckhead.