We keep being told the surge is working, but the facts don’t match the words. More than 200 people were killed Tuesday, and more than 200 wounded when an ancient Yazidi religious sect in northern Iraq was targeted. Reportedly Sunni Arab guerillas are responsible for the bombing, so it will be interesting to see how Bush tries to turn this into Iranian backed or Al-Qaeda backed violence. Also Tuesday, uniformed gunmen in 17 official vehicles stormed an Oil Ministry compound in Baghdad and abducted a deputy oil minister and three other official. Monday, 5 U.S. troops were killed by…..guess who…..Sunni Arab guerillas. 5 more U.S. troops died Tuesday when a U.S. transport helicopter crashed in Iraq’s western desert , bringing the month total to 41. Oh then there’s the strategic bridge that was blown up outside Baghdad on Tuesday, sending cars plunging into the river and killing atleast 10 people. It’s the second attack on the bridge in three month.

By the by….aren’t the Sunnis the ones we are arming and who are “helping” us? Yah….that’s what I thought. Great plan!!! And the MSM keeps letting these idiots claim the surge is working in Iraq…..without calling them on it. News channels, NOT. News models letting anyone say anything they want and claim it’s fact….YES.

The Bush administration is preparing to declare that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps is a foreign terrorist organization, senior administration officials said Tuesday.

If imposed, the declaration would signal a more confrontational turn in the administration’s approach to Iran and would be the first time that the United States has added the armed forces of any sovereign government to its list of terrorist organizations.

The Revolutionary Guard is thought to be the largest branch of Iran’s military. While the United States has long labeled Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism, a decision to single out the guard would amount to an aggressive new challenge from an American administration that has recently seemed conflicted over whether to take a harder line against Tehran over its nuclear program and what American officials have called its destabilizing role in Iraq.

More at the New York Times

By JUAN A. LOZANO
The Associated Press

HOUSTON - In a confrontation captured on videotape, a hospital security guard fired a stun gun to stop a defiant father from taking home his newborn, sending both man and child crashing to the floor. Now William Lewis says his baby girl suffers from head trauma because she was dropped.

“I’ve got to wonder what kind of moron would Tase an adult holding a baby,” said George Kirkham, a former police officer and criminologist at Florida State University. “It doesn’t take rocket science to realize the baby is going to fall.”

Lewis, 30, said the April 13 episode began after he and his wife felt mistreated by staff at the Woman’s Hospital of Texas and they decided to leave. Hospital employees told him doctors would not allow it, but Lewis picked up the baby and strode to a bank of elevators.

The elevators would not move because wristband sensors on each baby shut them off if anyone takes an infant without permission.

Lewis, who gave the video to The Associated Press, said his daughter landed on her head, but it cannot be seen on the video. He said the baby continues to suffer ill effects from the fall.

read more and see video HERE

By PAT MILTON
The Associated Press

NEW YORK - Former NBA referee Tim Donaghy planned to plead guilty in federal court on Wednesday to charges alleging he wagered on games he officiated, a person familiar with the betting scandal probe said.

Donaghy was to surrender at Brooklyn federal court, the person said on condition of anonymity because charges had not been made public yet.

NBA spokesman Tim Frank told the AP the league was informed Tuesday that Donaghy would plead Wednesday but was given no further information.

Donaghy’s attorney, John Lauro, and federal prosecutors declined to comment. NBA commissioner David Stern said last month the referee’s lawyer told the league his client was contemplating a plea.

Besides allegedly placing his own wagers, investigators also examined whether Donaghy provided inside information to others, including referees’ schedules. The referee had a gambling problem and was approached by low-level mob associates through an acquaintance, a law enforcement official said.

The FBI first contacted the NBA on June 20 to talk about a referee alleged to be gambling on games, and the two sides met on June 21, Stern said last month. Donaghy resigned July 9 after 13 years as a referee, though Stern said he would have fired him sooner but was told it might affect the investigation.

read more HERE

By James Carville
from FT (Financial Times)

There is an old joke that campaign veterans toss around war rooms, bars and BS sessions. We say there are people who have worked in campaigns who say that they have lost some - and we call those folks operatives, managers, strategists, consultants; and then there are people who work in campaigns and say that they have never lost, and we call them liars.

The joke reflects an obsession with winning as the real benchmark of success in politics. By that measure, Karl Rove’s career has to be deemed a success. He built the Republican party of Texas into one of the most powerful state parties in America.

Nationally he has pulled off some of the most unexpected and impressive victories of modern political history. (I will not be debating the 2000 election for the purposes of this article, but I also will not be crediting him with it, so let us just move on to the next cycle.)

Mr Rove picked up seats in what was an almost historically impossible context in 2002. Then in 2004, he engineered one of the most remarkable feats in American politics. He got Americans to re-elect a president who they really did not want to re-elect. Even the Republican defeat in 2006 was predictable and well within the range of historical norms so, by this sport’s standard of winning and losing, there is still no black mark on Rove’s record.

If we concluded our analysis in 2007 and confined our judgment merely to Mr Rove’s immediate electoral record, we would have no choice but to judge him a spectacular success. There is no doubt that Mr Rove won elections. He has perhaps one of the most remarkable win-percentages in modern American politics.

read more HERE

by Brian Beutler
Alternet.org

Oil companies know that gasoline expands at higher temperatures and has less volume at lower ones, but they’ve refused to upgrade gas stations with a simple tool that would adjust the price of gas according to its temperature.

It’s probably intuitive to most people that the gasoline in their fuel tank expands in the heat — just like doorframes and cookware and everything else on the planet. What’s probably less intuitive is that, in the United States, this physical phenomenon pumps a nearly $2 billion annual windfall out of consumers’ pockets and into oil company coffers, according to numerous calculations, including a recent House of Representatives study.

The North Carolina-based company Gilbarco Veeder-Root manufactures a device — a temperature’sensitive chamber for fuel — that, if affixed to gasoline pumps across the country, would return that money to consumers and help relieve some of our storied gas-price pressures. The device — and others like it — is simple, functional and, in fact, already in widespread use at gas stations all across Canada. Last month, Democratic presidential hopeful and Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, chair of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee, held the second in a series of hearings to investigate why the technology has never made it into the American market.

Temperature is just one of the many variables that determine how much energy one tank of gasoline contains, and therefore how many miles it will pull your car. But the effects of temperature change are easier to calculate than, say, ethanol content or petroleum grade — and are therefore also easy to correct for. Here’s how it works.

read more HERE

The Pew Research Center

Summary of Findings

The American public continues to fault news organizations for a number of perceived failures, with solid majorities criticizing them for political bias, inaccuracy and failing to acknowledge mistakes. But some of the harshest indictments of the press now come from the growing segment that relies on the internet as its main source for national and international news.

The internet news audience - roughly a quarter of all Americans - tends to be younger and better educated than the public as a whole. People who rely on the internet as their main news source express relatively unfavorable opinions of mainstream news sources and are among the most critical of press performance. As many as 38% of those who rely mostly on the internet for news say they have an unfavorable opinion of cable news networks such as CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC, compared with 25% of the public overall, and just 17% of television news viewers.

The internet news audience is particularly likely to criticize news organizations for their lack of empathy, their failure to “stand up for America,” and political bias. Roughly two-thirds (68%) of those who get most of their news from the internet say that news organizations do not care about the people they report on, and 53% believe that news organizations are too critical of America. By comparison, smaller percentages of the general public fault the press for not caring about people they report on (53%), and being too critical of America (43%).

read more HERE

from Media Matters

A few weeks ago, “Hardball” host Chris Matthews fawned over Fred Thompson with his comments about Fred as “The Aqua Velva Man“. Now it looks as if Chris has lost interest in Fred and now fawns over Mitt Romney. Sheesh! - JS

On the August 13 edition of MSNBC’s Hardball, during an interview with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, host Chris Matthews said: “Let me ask you about [Republican presidential candidate] Mitt Romney. You know, I watched him on the [NBC] Today show this morning. He looks like a million bucks. Everything is perfect. Everything about him is perfect.” As examples, Matthews cited Romney’s “look,” his “manner,” and his “shirt,” with “never rolled-up sleeves” and “the tie always tied,” and asked: “That perfection — is that the Republican Party of the 21st century? Is that what we’re looking for, the perfect efficiency expert?” Huckabee responded: “Well, if it is, I’m not going to get the nomination, because I’m far from perfect. … I’ve got a bald spot on the back of my head. My life has been one of nothing but struggle in many ways.”

Matthews frequently fawns over Romney’s appearance, as Media Matters for America has documented. On the January 19 edition of Hardball, Matthews said of Romney: “He has the perfect chin, the perfect hair, he looks right.” On the February 13 edition of the show, Matthews said Romney has “got a great chin, I’ve noticed.”

read more and see the video HERE

from Slate Online

By LOLITA BALDOR
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Army’s top general said Tuesday that lengthening U.S. tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan beyond the current 15 months would be too stressful and risky for troops. Gen. George Casey, the Army’s chief of staff, also said he didn’t know when officials would be able to cut the length of soldiers’ tours back to 12 months.

“I don’t see going beyond the 15 months,” Casey said. “I’ve been there in Iraq, I’ve watched the nature of the combat and the stresses and strains that it puts on these soldiers.”

He said the 90-day extension ordered by officials earlier this year can pass quickly, but staying longer would hurt troops.

“Any more than that, it puts our soldiers at a level of stress and a level of risk that right now I’m not comfortable with,” he told reporters in an appearance at the National Press Club. “So it would be very hard for me to recommend going beyond the 15 months and … we want to get down from 15 months as quickly as we can.”

In an often blunt assessment of the state of the Army, Casey acknowledged that the long and repeated battlefield tours have knocked the Army out of balance, so it can no longer provide ready forces as quickly as it should for other missions.

“We’re consumed with meeting the current demands and we’re unable to provide ready forces as rapidly as we would like for other contingencies, nor are we able to provide an acceptable tempo of deployments to sustain our soldiers and families for the long haul,” said Casey. Before taking over as chief of the Army earlier this year, Casey was the top U.S. commander in Iraq.

read more HERE