“Bombshells”, A La Hypocrites
Buck February 23rd, 2008 - 10:26 amWhat they call bombshells, we call FACTS. Republicans truly are whiny, crybaby bed-wetters aren’t they!
My apologies. I’ve been out of the loop for several days now but, from what I have been able to keep up with, I haven’t seen anyone tie this unfolding drama to the Clinton/Lewinsky saga. Am I the only one that sees the similarities? Am I the only one to notice the HYPOCRISY of the right for not wanting to fire up a multi-million-dollar investigation into McCain’s past? Where’s the attempt by the high morals crowd to have McCain impeached (from something, anything)? This kind of thing is important, is it not? They said it was during Clinton’s presidency. What’s changed?
Must be another case of the IOKIYAR. F*cking hypocrites.
White House accuses NYT of anti-GOP bias
WASHINGTON - The White House sided with Sen. John McCain and accused The New York Times on Friday of repeatedly trying to “drop a bombshell” on Republican presidential nominees to undermine their candidacies.[...]
“And that is something that the Republican nominee has faced in the past and probably will face in this campaign,” [White House deputy press secretary Scott Stanzel] said. “And sometimes they make incredible leaps to try to drop those bombshells on the Republican nominee.”
As for the allegations about McCain, Stanzel said, “I’m not going to speak to the specifics in that story but it’s been our impression that they do drop those bombshells.”
In a statement Thursday, Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said, “We think the story speaks for itself.”
UPDATE:
“I will fight every moment of every day in this campaign to make sure Americans are not deceived by an eloquent but empty call for change,” McCain said after winning the Wisconsin primary. It was a thinly veiled suggestion that the Illinois Democrat, who has now won 11 straight primary and caucus contests over Hillary Rodham Clinton, lacks the experience, judgment and character a president needs.
Obama, (surely with the White House at his side!), should accuse McCain of “repeatedly trying to undermine his candidacy”.
WASHINGTON - The White House sided with Sen. John McCain and accused The New York Times on Friday of repeatedly trying to “drop a bombshell” on Republican presidential nominees to undermine their candidacies.[...]
February 23rd, 2008 at 10:33 am
Welcome back Buck! You are so missed when you are gone.
February 23rd, 2008 at 10:38 am
February 23rd, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Buck, what you’re missing in your analysis is that the New York Times Report on John McCain Is Pre-9/11 Journalism.
February 24th, 2008 at 8:41 am
Hey Guys, I read you from time to time… is so much to catch on. Well, while the media craze for Obama and the McCain lobbist… our infrastructure will be sold to the financiers. Remember, Wall Street and the whole financial system is broke.
By Obama, by Hillary, by McCain.. do not suffer to much, wellcome the new impose order … Bloomberg. Well the New York crowd is the winner… mucho dinero$$$.
http://www.larouchepac.com/pac.....oject.html
February 24th, 2008 at 10:12 am
Hey Bur$atil…..it’s always a pleasure to see you. When you’re not around I wonder how you’re doing!
February 24th, 2008 at 7:35 pm
QG, thanks. I am looking for the KI$$$$inger men as you know and see the national circus.