(Sidebar: Show - Hide)

Hillary’s Negative Campaigning

      Buck     May 2nd, 2008 - 7:09 am    

This was the point I was trying to make the other day. I don’t care for negative campaigning. It’s shitty, and the people that instigate it are shitty (just look at 2000 and 2004 for proof on that!).

The last thing this country needs now is another shitty president getting elected.

Pro-Hillary 527’s Spending On Anti-Obama Indiana Ad Now Tops $1 Million

The American Leadership Project — the 527 put together by big Hillary-backing unions and major donors — sank another $200,000 today into the ad they’re running in Indiana attacking Obama on the economy, ALP spokesperson Jason Kinney just confirmed to me.

That brings the total spent on the ad to $1.1 million, Kinney says. [...]

The massive total expenditure — by far the group’s biggest buy yet — underscores yet again the extent to which Hillary allies view Indiana as an absolute must-win.

I would rather the group had spent the money on finding something positive to say about Hillary. The ad:

(DISCLAIMER: This in no way makes me pro-Obama. I know shit when I see it and I’m just pointing it out.)

3 Responses to “Hillary’s Negative Campaigning”

  1. Buck Says:

    THIS is related and worth the read.

  2. Batocchio Says:

    This is pretty silly. It’s more on target for McCain, where they could go into far more detail.

  3. Bro Says:

    She and her campaign tried saying something positive about her but they couldn’t seem to keep themselves from straying from reality so they have obviously decided to put the focus on Obama’s past. Guilt by association? Gee Hillary, you sat on the Board of Directors of Walmart didn’t you, and now you’re trying to pander to union blue-collar America? I’m trying to resist the gag reflex and puking on my keyboard.

Leave a Reply




Page created: Aug 29, 08:59am - 14 queries  |  Dynamically served once in 0.215 seconds  |  WP-Cache