Greg Mueller says that Obama is a “risky bet” when it comes to foreign policy and national security. Apparently he isn’t aware that McCain publicly stated the “economy isn’t his strong point,” or that he was involved in that nasty Keating 5 business. Perhaps Mr. Mueller should be reminded of McCain’s “Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran” moment. I could also mention McCain’s adultery and mafia ties, but that would be over-kill, right?

Yes, Mr. Mueller…. we should be leery of Obama’s positions on foreign policy and national security.

How McCain could pull this one off

Can John McCain possibly win this thing? Can he actually win in November?

The outlook is bleak: The polls are ugly, the Electoral College map is grim, the economy is getting worse, and McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin may have energized the Republican base, but it has appalled and frightened many outside it.

Still, McCain’s campaign has come back from the dead more than once. He survived his early support for immigration reform, he not only survived but has prospered from his support for the Iraq war surge, and he rebuilt a primary campaign that was in a state of near collapse to win the Republican nomination. [...]

“McCain can definitely win the race,” [conservative politics expert, Greg] Mueller said. “McCain needs to change the discussion back to a referendum on Obama. He needs to define Obama’s agenda as dangerous to America.

“It is dangerous to the economy. Obama is calling for higher taxes, historical spending and a huge increase in regulation that will hamper American business. Contrast that with McCain’s message of lower taxes and freezing spending. On foreign policy and national security, Obama is a risky bet in a hostile world.

Government is bigger than it’s ever been. We’re deeper in debt than we’ve ever been. We are despised by other nations more than we’ve ever been. And republicans own every bit of it!