Ed Schultz on Morning Joe
by QuestionGirl • Wednesday, June 17th, 2009 - 2:58 pm
Ed Schultz was on Scarborough’s Morning Joe show. Right off the bat Scarborough and Muka tell him what’s wrong with his show. Then Scarborough asks him “Do you believe Dick Cheney wants Americans to die in a terrorist attack?” Maybe he thought Ed Scultz would back down. His answer: “You got it.” I agree with Schultz. Everything that Cheney has said since leaving office indicates that is what he wishes. He doesn’t care about Americans. What he cares about is being right…… about saving his ass. Good on you Ed, for having the balls to say what so many people think.
June 17th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
When Joe commented on Eds connection with the working class I would have dearly loved to see Ed reach over and just jackslap that arrogant ass. Been watching KO and Rachel but I may add Ed. :handjob:
June 20th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Cheney doesn't wish for a terrorist attack? Hardly. He's likely the one who made the decision in 2001 to do nothing. The Bu**sh** regime knew an attack was coming on 9/11 (e.g. the CIA intelligence reports, info on Al Qaeda from the Clinton administration) and my suspicion has always been that they chose to let it happen to justify starting wars. See: "project for a new american century", of which Cheney and other neo-convicts like Rumsfelch, Kristol, Perle, Wolfowitz and others were participants.
It was Cheney who leaked Valerie Plame's name to the press as a CIA operative. What was Plame's job at the CIA? The Iranian desk. It was her job to collect information on whether Iran was building or getting nuclear weapons. Cheney knew this and leaked her name anyway.
If Iran is a "terrorist nation" as Cheney claims, then Cheney aided the "terrorists". Funny how Joe Scumbag doesn't want to discuss that...or the name Michael Griffin.
http://gawker.com/5279175/joe-scarborough-once-defended-the-murderer-of-an-abortion-doctor
If Scumbag wants to change the subject when he's losing the argument, change it yourself, or better yet, keep pressing the original argument.