Archive for the ‘Agriculture’ Category

Thursday, August 2nd

opinion: farm policy - I’m Ripping You Off

By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

YAMHILL, Ore.

One measure of the inanity of our national farm policy is that you, as a taxpayer, are paying me not to grow crops here in Oregon.

Democratic House leaders have rammed through another grotesque farm bill on the assumption that the only people who will pay attention will be the beneficiaries. Let’s hope that they-re wrong, because this is a classic example of weak-kneed politicians caving in to special interests.

I grew up on a sheep and cherry farm here in Yamhill, Ore., and still have some timberland outside of town. Every year I get paid $588 not to farm it, under the Conservation Reserve Program.

That’s right: taxpayers are subsidizing a New York columnist not to plant crops in a forest in Oregon.

But at least I-m alive. The Government Accountability Office last month found that the government had handed out $1.1 billion over seven years to dead farmers. In one case, payments were made continually to a farmer who had died in 1973.

When I planted new Douglas fir seedlings on my land, care for the young trees was also subsidized. So America provides health care for tree seedlings but not for millions of children.

Maybe uninsured American children who can-t get adequate health care could masquerade as cotton plants or cornstalks. Then the farm bill would shower them with money and care.

What’s especially dispiriting is how quickly the House Democrats under Speaker Nancy Pelosi have tumbled from idealism to cynicism. The Democrats had promised reform - but then the House leaders worried that scrapping welfare for farmers might hurt the re-election prospects of some newly elected Democrats. So they killed the reform proposals (which are backed by many rank-and-file Democrats).

Read more »


Thursday, July 26th

White House threatens veto for farm bill

By Christopher Doering

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House threatened on Wednesday to veto a broad agriculture law being drafted in Congress, which the administration said misses a major chance to overhaul U.S. farm policy in dire need of reform.

The Bush administration has argued that the House Agriculture Committee’s plan for the 2007 farm bill — which will set subsidy, biofuels, rural development, conservation and nutrition spending for five years — increases taxes unnecessarily and uses accounting tricks to pay for programs.

“Myself, and the president’s entire team of senior advisors, will recommend that he veto the bill if it is adopted in its current form,” Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns told reporters. “There are serious problems with the way this (House) bill was put together.”

The farm bill package, passed last week under the leadership of committee Chairman Rep. Collin Peterson, would deny subsidies to people with an adjusted gross income above $1 million, which Johanns said would only be about 3,000 people. It also would require payments to be tracked to an individual.

The Bush administration has expressed concern that the House falls short on priorities such as renewable energy and rural development. It also said the bill does not sufficiently limit eligibility for government farm supports.

read more at Reuters



Page created: Oct 08, 07:08am ~ 14 queries  |  Cached by WP-Cache ~ 0.188 seconds